https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/pi3k-hdac-inh
1%)] and the non-sarcopenia group [133/137 (97.1%)], P = 0.1778). The rate of perforation and the rate of delayed bleeding were not significantly different between the sarcopenia group and the non-sarcopenia group [6/134 (4.5%) vs. 9/137 (6.6%), P = 0.314, 4/134 (3%) vs. 6/137 (4.4%), P = 0.3885, respectively]. The presence of sarcopenia did not influence the rate of complications after ESD. Colorectal ESD is safe and effective even in patients with sarcopenia. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to confirm our r
Like
Comment
Share
