https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bx-795.html
9 and -4.49 kcal/mol, respectively. The binding score of tebuconzaol with 1D2S was found to be -7.54 kcal/mol compared to native ligand dihydrotestosteron and inhibitor aminoglutethimide which exhibited the binding score of -6.84 and -11.41 kcal/mol, respectively. Therefore, each complex was subjected to MD simulation for comparative assessment of physical movement. The root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), Radius of Gyration and hydrogen bonding exhibited that fluconazole had stable binding pattern with