https://www.selleckchem.com/ph....armacological_epigen
001). In the erect position, the ED was 47% higher [0.17 (0.13 to 0.33) mSv 0.12 (0.08 to 0.18) mSv ( 0.001)], influenced by the increased sagittal diameter. 42 (70%) patients preferred the standing examination. Patient diameter and pelvic tilt were altered on weightbearing. Erect images demonstrated an overall decrease in image quality with a higher radiation dose. Optimal acquisition parameters are required for erect pelvis radiography as the supine technique is not directly transferable. Patient diameter and pelvic ti