https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/Camptothecine
Results There were significant differences in gender, age, disease type, site and size between training set and validation set (all P0.05). Compared with ASL-CBF, GAN-CBF had a higher structural similarity index (0.888 vs 0.801, P less then 0.001), and a lower normalized root mean square error (0.628 vs 0.775, P less then 0.001). The correlation between GAN-CBF and quantitative perfusion in different blood vessel supply areas and stroke lesion areas was improved compared with the original ASL-CBF, in which the perforating bran
Like
Comment
Share
