https://www.selleckchem.com/products/U0126.html
8years, 51.3% male) were evaluated. AND-ASPEN [AUROC 0.846; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.810-0.883] and GLIM presented a satisfactory accuracy (AUROC 0.842; 95% CI, 0.807-0.877), whereas ESPEN had a substantially lower accuracy (AUROC, 0.572; 95% CI, 0.522-0.622). The AUROC of AND-ASPEN and GLIM were not different from each other (p=0.785) and both had significantly higher accuracy than ESPEN (p0.001). AND-ASPEN and GLIM presented sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value 80%, whereas ESPEN sensitivity was 20%.