https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/conteltinib-c
1%) was similar to that in the usual IV arm (26/28, 92.8%, p=0.958). Patient satisfaction at day 5 was better in the routine PICC arm (97%, 'a little comfort' or 'much comfort' compared with the usual IV arm (21%) (p 0.001). Routine PICC insertion in terminally ill cancer patients was comparable in safety and efficacy and resulted in superior satisfaction compared with usual IV access. Thus, routine PICC insertion could be considered at admission to the HPC unit (NCT03299868). Routine PICC insertion in terminally ill can
Like
Comment
Share
