https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/FK-506-(Tacro
2%, 17 of 184), type of study series (13.6%, 25 of 184), and implications for practice (20.7%, 44 of 184). There was no significant difference in the number of reported STARD criteria between abstracts accepted for oral presentation (M = 5.35, SD = 1.31) and abstracts accepted for the electronic poster session (M = 5.39, SD = 1.45) (p = .86). CONCLUSIONS The adherence with STARD for abstract was low, indicating that providing authors with the related checklist may increase the quality of abstracts.Even after a long time of r
Like
Comment
Share
