https://www.selleckchem.com/products/v-9302.html
ts considering harms were represented in a way that supported the intervention. Most of the statements (94%) did not include numeric estimates of magnitude of the effect. When numeric estimates of magnitude of the effect were present, they were most frequently relative measures and were typically placed in a statement considering (a) intervention benefits with a primary outcome, (b) given the grade of A for level of evidence, and (c) that supported the use of intervention. Conclusions In the Finnish CPGs, the statements were rarely frame
Like
Comment
Share
