https://www.selleckchem.com/products/WP1130.html
48 ± 94.10 mL in the IMF incision group, P = 0.017). Wound dehiscence occurred in 12 and 0 cases in the previous and IMF incision groups, respectively (P = 0.018). Implant removal was performed due to dehiscence in 9 cases (8.18%) and 0 cases (0%) in the previous and IMF incision groups, respectively (P = 0.049). In 1-to-1 propensity score matching analysis, the IMF incision group showed better results at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio 0, 95% confidence interval 0-1.09; P = 0.063). The IMF approach is a safe method for replacing the expand
Like
Comment
Share
