https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ipi-549.html
024; 95% CI 0.737-1.423; P = 0.886) or PFS (HR = 0.809; 95% CI 0.582-1.126; P = 0.197) between the two groups. The good short-term response subgroup showed a better PFS and favoured CCRT + AC treatment (HR = 0.542; 95% CI 0.336-0.876; P = 0.008), the independent predictive role of which was confirmed in additional multivariate Cox regression analysis. Although AC did not significantly improve PFS and OS for all ESCC patients after CCRT, the short-term response to CCRT might help identify a subgroup that will benefit, which needs further
Like
Comment
Share
