https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/epacadostat-i
6 ± 21.1) compared to Group B (95.9 ± 4.6) (p = 0.04). Side to side difference in KT-2000 arthrometer (2.3 ± 2.2 mm vs 1.0 ± 2.3 mm, Group A vs Group B, respectively, p less then 0.01) and ratio of post-operative positive pivot shift was significantly greater in Group A (30.7%) compared to Group B (7.1%) (p less then 0.01). No significant difference was seen in re-injury rate (n.s.). CONCLUSION Teenage patients have a greater tendency for residual knee joint laxity after DB-ACLR. Although teenagers and patients in the
Like
Comment
Share
