https://www.selleckchem.com/products/thz1.html
001) workload (211.8 ± 106.0kJ) than CONC (78.1 ± 62.6kJ) over 34 training sessions. ECC showed 1.5 ± 2.1% greater SpO , 24.7 ± 4.1% lower HR, and 64.4 ± 29.6% lower dyspnea in average than CONC (P 0.001). ECC increased LLFFM (4.5 ± 6.2%; P = 0.03), while CONC decreased LLFM (3.3 ± 6.4%; P = 0.04) after training. Both ECC and CONC reduced (P 0.05) SAWT (-16.1 ± 9.3% vs -10.1 ± 14.4%) and SDWT (-12.2 ± 12.6% vs -14.4 ± 14.7%), and improved (P 0.05) QOL (33.4 ± 38.8 vs 26.1 ± 36.6%) similarly, but only ECC improved (P 0.0
Like
Comment
Share
