https://www.selleckchem.com/products/snx-2112.html
001) and SPM (P 0.001). Both methods are accurate within 1 mm of the actual magnitude of shortening from 30-degree internal rotation to 15-degree ER. At 30-degree ER, shortening was underestimated by -2.10 mm using the OM (95% confidence interval, -2.43 to -1.76; P 0.01) and by -1.64 mm using the SPM (95% confidence interval, -1.83 to -1.45; P 0.01). This study demonstrates that both the OM and SPM are accurate and reliable assessments for femoral neck shortening; however, both methods are sensitive to extreme ER. Given
Like
Comment
Share
