https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/pf-06826647.h
3-0.37 cm (3.4%-4.32%); equation B, 0.3-0.48 cm (3.24%-5.41%); equation A, 2.44-2.97 cm (24.05%-29.2%)). A significant correlation (r = 0.83) in percentage of change in Lf values was observed only between EFOV and MLE. We showed that four distinct US methods lead to different results in the assessment of BFlh Lf changes after a short-term period of unloading. The implementation of EFOV technique (or alternatively MLE) to assess Lf changes in BFlh during longitudinal studies is warranted. We showed that four distinct US methods lead
Like
Comment
Share
