https://notes.io/w3Cyp
In this case, the success rates of Pocket-Finder strategy these of Q-SiteFinder (Fig. 7A). Indeed, there's little change each in the success rate or the average quantity of predicted sites for Q-SiteFinder in going from a precision threshold of 0–25%. This implies that the method is relatively insensitive to vary in the precision threshold in distinction to Pocket-Finder. This is due to the fact that the average precision of Pocket-Finder is 29% whereas that of Q-SiteFinder is 68%. The volumes of the websites predicted by Q-SiteFinder are only weakly depending on
Like
Comment
Share
