https://www.selleckchem.com/products/AC-220.html
8 to -2.9% [WT] with reference to 0kJ·kg-1 vs -1.1% to -4.4% [PT] after 15kJ·kg-1 and of -4.7% to -8.8% [WT] vs -7.6% to -11.6% [PT] after 45kJ·kg-1). No consistent differences were found between WT and PT cyclists in MMP values assessed in nonfatigue conditions (after 0kJ·kg-1), but WT cyclists attained significantly higher MMP values with accumulating levels of fatigue, particularly for long-duration efforts (≥5min). Our findings highlight the importance of considering fatigue when assessing the record power profile of endurance athlet
Like
Comment
Share
