https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/enpp-1-in-1.h
In addition, turnaround time also had a negative effect, mainly in P3 (3.12 ± 0.28 s), signaling the improvement of this variable in all protocols (P1 3.30 ± 0.38 s; P2 3.17 ± 0.30 s; P4 3.17 ± 0.34 s). P2 (after 80 ± 11%; before 82.7 ± 9.9%) and P3 (after 82.7 ± 9.9%; before 85.1 ± 9.7%) presented a possible positive effect on the percentage of voluntary activation in relation to P1 (after 79.3 ± 10.7%; before 76.3 ± 12%). In conclusion, the proposed conditioning activity protocols were not efficient for performance improvement in
Like
Comment
Share
