https://www.selleckchem.com/products/mg149.html
05). Significant reductions were obtained in the residual filling material after supplementary cleaning (P .05). XPR (47.5%) led to significantly greater (P .05) filling material removal than UAI (16.6%) or EAI (22.6%). The removal values of the 2 latter systems were not significantly different. XPR was more effective than UAI and EAI in removing filling material in mandibular premolars with oval canals. None of the tested supplementary cleaning techniques completely removed the residual filling material. XPR was more effective
Like
Comment
Share
