https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd8186.html
We compared the associations of traditional muscle measures, ALM/(E/I)W, and LLM/(E/I)L, with grip strength and lower limb power using jumping mechanography. LLM/(E/I)L explained jump power best at R 2 = 0.803 compared with ALM/(E/I)W (p  less then  0.0001) and all other measures. ALM/(E/I)W explained jump power second best (R 2 = 0.759) but not significantly better than traditional muscle measures. No muscle measure performed better than covariates when predicting handgrip strength. LLM/(E/I)L outperformed ALM/ht2 and ALM/BMI when pred