https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/ag-1024-tyrph
TE+RPD intervention presented lower cost and effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RCT+IRR+SC and TE+DI+SC interventions compared to TE+RPD were $13.06 and $9.92 per year of survival. Compared to RCT+IRR+SC, the TE+DI+SC intervention had an ICER=$26.90 per year of survival. The acceptability curve indicates that the choice of intervention depends on the willingness to pay. The RCT+IRR+SC intervention presented a balance of cost-effectiveness. Rehabilitation with implants can be considered in view o
Like
Comment
Share
