https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/milademetan.h
The performance was quantified in silico by measuring the error with respect to a known "ground truth" data set with no clutter for different combinations of moving clutter and tissue. Our method retains more tissue with a lower error of 3.88 ± 0.093 dB (sparse coding) and 3.47 ± 0.78 (nuclear norm) compared with the benchmark methods 8.5 ± 0.7 dB (SVF) and 9.3 ± 0.5 dB (MCA) particularly in instances where the rate of tissue motion and artifact motion is small (≤0.25 periods of center frequency per frame) while producing comparable
Like
Comment
Share
