https://www.selleckchem.com/products/prt543.html
ncrease = 45.5%, p less then .001) and increased interest in pursuing MAT training (percent increase = 21.5%, p = .04). Both curricular interventions were equally effective at reducing OUD stigma with a significant 8.2% decrease in total stigma scores and a large effect size (p less then .001, ηp2 = .34). Lastly, participants with lower post-assessment OUD stigma scores were more likely to indicate that they would pursue additional training to provide MAT (p = .02). Lessons learned Exposure to opioid-specific education with a focus on MA
Like
Comment
Share
