https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/gf109203x.htm
87 versus clinical prediction 0.65), cross-validation results (AUC DECT 0.87 versus clinical prediction 0.65), and original data (AUC DECT 0.85 versus clinical prediction 0.68). By combining clinical and radiological parameters, the predictive performance for sICH could be further improved with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.96). Based on DECT parameters acquired immediately after successful MT, the present model was more efficient than the clinical model for accurate prediction of sICH. Rho and ICME volume appeared to be the best para
Like
Comment
Share
