https://www.selleckchem.com/products/hs-10296.html
Vco2/Vo2 slope and ventilatory efficiency (VE/Vco2 slope) were not affected by posture. Aerobic work efficiency (Vo2/P slope) and gross efficiency (GE) differed significantly between postures. Hereby, GE was lowest in supine cycling, particularly obvious in a mainly aerobic condition at 70 Watt [Median 11.6 (IQR 10.9-13.3) vs. recumbent 15.9 (IQR 15.6-18.3) and upright 17.4 (IQR 15.1-18.3)]. Peak power as well as GE and work efficiency values are influenced by cycling position, reinforcing the importance of adjusting test results for t
Like
Comment
Share
