https://www.selleckchem.com/ph....armacological_epigen
03 to 3.05 J. Furthermore, the energy absorption was associated with the hip impact configuration (F = 4.69, p = 0.016). On average, the absorbed energy was 62% greater in posteriolateral than anteriolateral impact (0.92 versus 0.57 J). However, the energy absorption did not differ between male and female (F = 0.91, p = 0.36). The force-deflection behavior of the femoral soft tissue during a fall has been recorded, providing insights on the potential protective benefits of the soft tissue covering during a fall. Performing a
Like
Comment
Share
