https://www.selleckchem.com/ALK.html
Site and scene-level correlates of error were investigated. RESULTS Agreement between EVIP and ground truth was high for number of people in the scene (CCC=0.88; MAE=2.7 and moderate for number of people active (CCC=0.55; MAE=2.57). EVIP error was uncorrelated with camera placement, presence of obstructions or shadows, and setting type. For both number in scene and number active, EVIP outperformed SOPARC observations in estimating ground truth values (CCCs were larger by 0.11-0.12 and MAEs smaller by 41%-48%). CONCLUSION Computer vision algorithms
Like
Comment
Share
