Translate   1 w

https://www.selleckchem.com/products/cc-92480.html
1%) in ICG FA group vs. 31 (16.3%) in non-ICG FA group (p = 0.04). ICG FA did not decrease AL rate of high (at 9 -15 cm from anal verge) anastomoses 1.3% vs 4.6% in non-ICG FA group (p=0.37). In contrast, a decrease in AL rate was found for low (4 - 8 cm) colorectal anastomoses (14.4% in ICG FA vs. 25.7% non-ICG FA in non-ICG FA group (p=0.04) CONCLUSION ICG FA is associated with a reduction in anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection.. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.NO removal from exhausted ga

  • Like
  • Love
  • HaHa
  • WoW
  • Sad
  • Angry