https://www.selleckchem.com/products/blu9931.html
0 (130.0, 210. vs 120.0 (80.0, 170. ng/L, 170.0 (120.0, 260. vs 130.0 (90.0, 180. ng/L; 28.9 (15.9, 63.5) vs 4.3 (1.9, 11.8) (ng/L) / (mU/L) , 55.6 (39.0, 109. vs 9.8 (4.5, 21.3) (ng/L) /(mU/L), all P 7.8 (ng/L) / (mU/L) can be used as an alternative cut-off point to screen PA when drug washout is not available.Objective To analyze the mechanism of invasive blood pressure change in radial artery caused by arm elevation by observing pressure, velocity and diameter of radial artery. Methods Twenty-six hemodynamically stable hepa