https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ted-347.html
Follow-up was available for 30 patients confirming 26 pathological scans with positive follow-up in PET-rainbow, and 23 in hot-metal new. Three pathological scans were missed in hot-metal new. Patient-level sensitivity was higher for PET-rainbow (0.96) compared to hot-metal new (0.85). Inter-reader reliability was higher for hot-metal new (Fleiss κ = 0.76) compared to PET-rainbow (Fleiss κ = 0.6. Use of PET-rainbow was associated with improved lesion detection and sensitivity compared to hot-metal new, although at cost of reduced inte
Like
Comment
Share
