https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/jnj-64619178.
09 - 1.34). Low performers derived a greater benefit from feedback (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18 - 2.23) compared with moderate performers (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11 - 1.29), whereas high performers did not derive a significant benefit (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99 - 1.13). Feedback was not associated with increases in withdrawal time (WMD +0.43 minutes; 95% CI, -0.50 to +1.36 minutes) or improvements in cecal intubation rate (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99 - 1.01). CONCLUSION Endoscopist feedback is associated with modest improvements in ADR. The implem
Like
Comment
Share
