https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/nvp-tnks656.h
Both groups showed similar CPR performance at baseline. At week-0, the Feedback Group had a significantly higher CS compared to the Standard Group (adjusted difference 20% [95% CI 11%-29%; p 0.001]). This difference attenuated over time but remained significant at the week-10 and week-28 follow-up; however, by the week-52 follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups. Using a real-time visual feedback device during CPR training significantly improves skill acquisition and retention in high school students and sh
Like
Comment
Share
