https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/GSK1904529A.h
The fit, shape, and retention of the digitally designed and conventionally made prostheses were assessed and compared. Design considerations were identified and documented through the iterative design process. RESULTS A final design workflow was iteratively developed based on the 5 participants. The shapes of the digitally designed prostheses were well matched to nontreatment anatomy overall. Prosthesis fit was variable Some digitally designed prostheses fit the participant intimately through a range of movements, and others experie