https://www.selleckchem.com/products/3-typ.html
5 ± 11.0 s) was significantly shorter than that for PI (173.0 ± 54.4 s, p 0.0001). SNR and CNR of PI with CS were significantly better than those with PI (mean SNR; 11.2 ± 3.6 vs 8.9 ± 2.6, median of CNR; 7.4 vs. 6.1, p 0.0001). All inter-observer agreements were assessed as significant and substantial (0.62 κ 0.81). PI with CS accelerated T2 weighted sequence performs equally well or even slightly better than its PI accelerated, conventional counterpart at reduced scan times in the context of head and neck MR imaging.
Like
Comment
Share
