https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/ly2880070.htm
32, 0.14-0.66; P = 0.001), but not HFrEF (0.91, 0.38-2.1; P = 0.828) per 10% increase. MR-proANP was associated with the composite endpoint in HFpEF (1.46, 1.03-1.94; P = 0.034), but not in HFrEF (1.14, 0.88-1.37; P = 0.278), per 100 pM increase. CONCLUSION We found different relationships between LA remodelling and biomarkers in HFrEF and HFpEF. Our results support the hypothesis that the pathophysiologic underpinnings of HFpEF and HFrEF are different, and atrial remodelling encompasses distinct components for each HF subtype. Publi
Like
Comment
Share
