https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/rucaparib.htm
0%, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in calorie intake between the intermittent and continuous group during the first 3 days (2595.4 ± 394.5 kcal vs 2317.8 ± 645.1 kcal, p = 0.099). No significant difference in total calorie intake was found between two groups (6265.6 ± 1261.3 kcal vs 6429.4 ± 1452.4 kcal, p = 0.597). CONCLUSION Continuous tube feeding was an effective way to improve the tolerance of enteral nutrition. But no enough evidence was found to support the advantage in calorie intake of continuous tube feeding
Like
Comment
Share
