https://www.selleckchem.com/products/a-196.html
RESULT No significant difference was documented between the Oberlin procedure and ICN-MCN transfer in terms of reinnervation results (P = 0.6). However, a significant difference in restoration of muscle force was found between the mFCU (95.83%) and ICN-MCN transfers (66.66%) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION The evidence from the present study indicates that although ICN-MCN transfer is a viable method for reanimation of elbow flexion in BPI, mFCU nerve is a better donor if exists.BACKGROUND To present the outcomes of arthroscopic electrothermal shr
Like
Comment
Share
