https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/SB-216763.htm
05), while the gnathion angle and first molar width values in G1 were significantly higher than those in G3 (P less then 0.05). The results in G2 were similar to those in G1, but the differences between G2 and G3 were greater than those between G1 and G3. There were no significant differences in the other measurements among the groups. CONCLUSION The mandibles of the subjects with impacted second molars were constricted in terms of the sagittal length and transverse width. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.AI
Like
Comment
Share
