https://www.selleckchem.com/products/kpt-8602.html
When Cr(Ⅵ)-contaminated soil was remediated with sulfide, due to incomplete reaction and overdose, excess sulfide could remain in the soil inducing unacceptable underestimation of residual Cr(Ⅵ) analysis, which would get worse when iron ions were introduced in. Unfortunately, the quality control policy of Method 3060a cannot distinguish the difference between real zero and false zero residual Cr(Ⅵ) when their spike recoveries are zero. This paper systematically investigated the sulfide-induced Cr(Ⅵ) reduction in Cr(Ⅵ) analysis by Metho
Like
Comment
Share
