https://www.selleckchem.com/products/i-191.html
04-0.12) in the intracranial approach and 10% (95% CI, 0.01-0.23) in the extracranial approach The subgroup analysis of the intracranial approach showed higher CSF leakage prevalence in the frontal craniotomy approach (9%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16) than the subfrontal osteotomy (6%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12). Meta-analysis study revealed a significantly higher risk of CSF leakage (OR 2.82; 95% CI, 1.03-7.72), a higher reoperation rate (OR 5.38; 95% CI 1.13 - 25.76), and the recurrence rate (RR 4.63; 95% CI, 1.51-14.2 for the extracranial approach. Th
Like
Comment
Share
