https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/direct-red-80
05). Meta-analysis limited to studies with the adjustment of smoking status also showed similar results (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05, p = 0.21; I = . No publication bias was detected based on the Egger regression test (p = 0.32). Current evidence from cohort studies does not support that MetS is an independent risk factor for the incidence of lung cancer. Current evidence from cohort studies does not support that MetS is an independent risk factor for the incidence of lung cancer. Quinolone prophylaxis is recommended for patie
Like
Comment
Share
