https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/pim447-lgh447
The study population included 219 patients [median age 65 (interquartile range 57-72) years, 41% females, 59% persistent AF, 25% LVAs]. Both scores were significantly associated with LVAs [OR 1.817, 95% CI 1.376-2.399 for APPLE and 2.288, 95% CI 1.650-3.172 for (m)APPLE]. Using receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, the (m)APPLE score [area under the curve (AUC) 0.779, 95% CI 0.702-0.855] showed better LVAs prediction than the APPLE score (AUC 0.704, 95% CI 0.623-0.784), however, without statistically significant diffe
Like
Comment
Share
