https://www.selleckchem.com/products/SRT1720.html
0001) and AP (0.703-0.759; p less then 0.0001). However, regression and Bland-Altman analyses showed models with declining agreement as power values increased. Therefore, analyses were repeated using a quadratic model, showing stronger predictive capacity (PP R = 0.786; AP R = 0.878; p less then 0.0001). Validity of this model was evaluated in a second sample of 30 older women (age = 69.9 ± 4.7) and men (age = 70.7 ± 4.3). Computed GJST AP and PP were compared with power produced during dominant arm chest press and distance during the s
Like
Comment
Share
