https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/Fulvestrant.h
4±4.7 vs. 76.2±3.2 min, p=0.04). This was driven by significant decreases in the steps transport and setup (10.4±0.8 vs. 8.0±0.7 min, p= 0.03) and positioning (20.8±2.1 vs. 15.7±1.3 min, p= 0.046). Of note, the total time spent in the operating room was lower for Group 2 (270.1±14.6 vs. 252.8±14.1 min) but the result was not statistically significant, even when adjusting for number of operated levels. Conclusion Lean methodology may be successfully applied to posterior cervical spine surgery whereby improvements in the perioperative
Like
Comment
Share
