https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/adenosine-5-d
Our paper differs from previous literature in two ways 1.We think in terms of clinical consequences, what benefits patients, what harms patients. Our main message is using a not logic-respecting efficacy measure can potentially harm patients in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), as we prove analytically, and demonstrate with the OAK blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTM study. 2.We follow nature, which mixes effects within each treatment arm. Our secondary message is that following nature to mix within
Like
Comment
Share
