https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/liraglutide.h
In the 2-back task, which requires greater amounts of working memory, CRF also predicted greater target and non-target accuracy and d' scores. Comparatively, MF did not predict any cognitive outcomes after adjustment for CRF. Conclusions CRF was selectively related to better performance during task conditions, which require greater amounts of inhibition and working memory. This suggests that CRF, but not MF, may benefit cognitive control in older adolescents. This selective influence of CRF on older adolescents' cognition highlights
Like
Comment
Share
