https://www.selleckchem.com/Proteasome.html
42, p = .08; RMSEA = 0.034 [90% CI 0.000, 0.060], CFI = 0.992) and was measurement invariant across sex. Incentive salience was associated with drinking patterns (e.g., drinks per day, r = 0.447 [95% CI 0.379, 0.514]); reasons for drinking (urges/temptation r = 0.529 [95% CI 0.460, 0.599]); testing personal control, r = 0.384 (95% CI 0.308, 0.461); social pressure, r = 0.549 (95% CI 0.481, 0.617); and family history of AUD, r = 0.134. The incentive salience factor demonstrated greater predictive validity for drinking outcomes compared to alte
Like
Comment
Share
