https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd-1208.html
Results The use of both proximal and distal POT resulted in a smaller LM diameter compared to the mid POT. SBO was significantly higher in both proximal and distal configurations compared to mid POT 38.3 ± 5.1 and 29.3 ± 3.1 versus 18.3 ± 3.6%, respectively. Similarly stent malapposition was higher in both proximal and distal configurations compared to mid POT 1.3 ± 0.4 and 0.82 ± 1.8 versus 0.78 ± 1.2, respectively. Conclusions Mid POT offers the best results in terms of LCx opening maintaining slightly smaller but still acceptable LM
Like
Comment
Share
