https://www.selleckchem.com/products/escin.html
BACKGROUND counting respiratory rate over 60 seconds can be impractical in a busy clinical setting. METHODS 870 respiratory rates of 272 acutely ill medical patients estimated from observations over 15 seconds and those calculated by a computer algorithm were compared. RESULTS The bias of 15 seconds of observations was 1.85 breaths per minute and 0.11 breaths per minute for the algorithm derived rate, which took 16.2 SD 8.1 seconds. The algorithm assigned 88% of respiratory rates their correct National Early Warning Score points, compared
Like
Comment
Share
