https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/l-name-hcl.ht
Evidence quality and predictive score usability were assessed according to the PROBAST framework. The current systematic review yielded 9242 abstracts, of which only one study detailing the development and validation of the Emergence Agitation Risk Scale (EARS) met the inclusion criteria. EARS had good discrimination with c-index of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.89). Calibration showed a non-significant Homer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p=0.97). Although the EARS demonstrated low concern of applicability, the high risk of bias compromise
Like
Comment
Share
