https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/gsk2879552-2h
5%) compared to school feeding program schools (27.8%) but stunting was less common (48.3% versus 58.5%). However, after adjustment for confounding, there was no difference in stunting levels, but the adjusted odds ratio for thinness in nonschool feeding program schools was 2.6 (95% CI (1.8, 3.8)) times higher than in school feeding program schools. Other independent risk factors for thinness were having uneducated mother, being a male and taking meal once daily. Independent risk factors for stunting were ethnicity, having unedu
Like
Comment
Share
